Is this correct and is my current use of PL due to some “feature” that will disappear if PL were to conform to the above? My experience with the Adobe suite (that I no longer use) and local Adobe Acrobat (not the latest, but sufficient for my needs) is that if MS File Explorer can “see” the directory/file, so can the application. Luminar Neo (like most photo cataloging tools) needs to have the files available locally (either on that computer or a direct connected drive) to work. In communication with a Luminar expert (similar to the EA Pro status for PL), I was informed: Accessing the images on a network drive is the issue. PL6 has no issue with such drives, directories/folders, files: if MS Win File Explorer can “see” the file, so can PL. When mounted under MS Windows (currently 10), these appear as shared folders (eg., z: ), and are fully accessible using MS Windows File Explorer as well as the text commands within Power Shell (listing, reading, writing, creating, renaming, etc). Rather, I keep these on a small storage area network, currently using SSD units that I plug and unplug from the network (not USB attached to the local machine). I do not keep my archived digital photograph files on any “local” machine (eg, the laptop/portable workstation upon which I am composing this post).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |